The Investigative Research of Supreme Court Justice
Amy Coney Barrett’s Philosophical Pabulum
questions Senators should have asked; I guess due diligence is a thing of the past, and or the solicitation, not
in the capacity of a Solicitor General, but nonetheless, seeking determinate answers of unrequited judicial and
political potential malfeasance by a recent addition to the Supreme Court, potentially undermining self-same
said trust thereof.
Substantiating evidence as Exhibits.
We the people of
the court, The
Case, in this case against Supreme Court Judge Amy Coney
Barrett, find said jurist negligent and charged as
such, for her libelous Originalist/Texturalist legal philosophy that she implements for the application and practice of her juris
As such; I,
Fuller, representing those with a citizenry
vested interest, has set forth a jury trial (trial of my peers), for the purpose and as such to serve as the
Jurors, at which and until such time; I, Thomas Fuller, the aggrieved, has sworn himself to be Judge and
The Case, set out
to prove beyond a reasonable doubt; with Exhibits to include her spoken words, recorded legal opinions and
political connections, based upon the entity(s) that invested in television time to advertise to the public and
Senators on behalf of the President’s selection and nomination.
Why???? Would any
organization spend money to back Amy Coney Barrett without a vested interest? Why would a
capitalist make an investment without seeking a return?
We invest in political campaigns because we expect a return; whether
for moral or immoral reasons. Ethics must
be higher for the judicial system.
What is her
return? My guess? I’d say
by adopting and accepting advertising her/their (vested party(s) in her nomination) legal philosophy of
Originalism/Texturalism, advertising it at here hearing so that it is/become normalized and commonplace as a
I don’t buy what
she/they are selling and as an aggrieved citizen, I must
When and where did
Amy Coney Barrett adapt or adopt such legal philosophy and from whom? It is definitely not a happenstance from
her epistemology legal inquiry.
I’m willing to bet it’s not a self-inflicted
There is nothing
about her and her education and practitioner as a legal scholar or jurist, that provide; as a capitalist would
say, “proof of concept.”
My research is to
prove my point that Amy Coney Barrett is not a legal scholar or jurist with a record/trail that shows she’s a
legal linguist with originality.
I will definitely define her as a case law manager; whereas, she has
memory and knowledge about legal cases.
Thus, I extrapolate
that someone sold her on the idea, and with the premise that she’ll be in a better professional advancement
position for postulating such pabulum. Surprisingly, her dream came true.
My nightmare; Amy
Coney Barrett, looked into my eyes through the television screen and told me, and the world is my witness, that
I am not a man, per judicial philosophy of Originalist/Texturalist.
To concentrate on
just one aspect of the Constitution, to her I said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men
are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
The only thing
missing was for her to say……
“Ladies and gentlemen of the court, can you believe this “nigger” is
challenging my philosophy. The
Constitution wasn’t written for you.”
True and exactly point.
Adherence to your
legal and binding philosophy, Amy Coney Barrett, as an Originalist/Texturalist jurist
means, I, as the progeny of a slave during the time period in question, did not apply to people of my
race. Can I ask whether it
applies to me today? If yes, then why then
and not now?
Mind you, as a
highly, but questionable educated jurist, I know biologically, there is no such thing as race, but for the sake
of clarity of concerns and positions, we can agree that your Originalist/Texturalist interpretation of the
Constitution in its original construct did not apply to me at that time?
Created is the
origin. Creation represents the origin, the birth and some religious people consider
Creationism a religious belief that presupposes that Nature originated through a supernatural
Did the legal
hegemony of the Constitution, validated at the time of its inception with words like, created and men; and as a
Texturalist, the words represented and applied to those other than, slaves and or those of that
Boy, why didn’t
they have the right to vote like the other men?
Then why on God’s
green earth would you even consider telling me to my face, when and or if I come before your court; you a
“nonpartisan” judge with apply the laws as originally constructed in the Constitution to my case today, in the
Are you that
miseducated and or misguided to know that espousing and applying such a philosophy as your juris prudence
detrimentally effects and affects us all as citizens of the U.S.A.?
Not only that, but
as an avowed Christian (not mixing Church and State), I’d like to know if you take the Bible in its original
construct? Do you love your neighbors?
Point being, you do
not understand law. Law is not the words, law is not the interpretation of the words; law, is the
intent. Murder as a law is not
defined by words, but intent and intent sets the precedent, not by definition and or
words. Murder today has many
other variables of and for intent.
The intent of the
Constitution is for it to serve as the foundation of and for the creative reinforcement of the structural
integrity of the United States of America. It’s an
unchanging foundation and that doesn’t mean just because the undergirding doesn’t change, the building also
It is therefore, my
assumption that you have been brainwashed, politically compromised and or beholden to advertise and adhere to a
legal philosophy that makes you malfeasant, and the warranting of moving beyond this preliminary legal inquiry
to a full-blown case: THE CASE.
An originalist looks at words of the Constitution in their original context to determine original meaning and a
textualist looks at the words of the Constitution and ask the question; why?
To provide an example of what an Originalist/Texturalist; especially a legal scholar, would do: Notice, the use of the word “juxtapose” above by the Prosecutor, when a word like
“contrast” would be a better substitute and fit, if differences are the major emphasis.
A jurist at the highest level who doesn’t or can’t clarify their individual philosophy in order to inoculate and
indemnify themselves through the process of validating his/her defining legal epistemology, does no one any good,
So I’m building, The Case; I’ll provide more examples into being an Originalist/Texturalist, by providing you the
public, insight into how I came about determining the foundation of my juris prudence. Easy work for a legal
scholar, difficult work for a lost one.
Now, I’ll provide you with my definition of juxtapose and explain why that word was used instead of
“contrast.” Juxtapose meaning: - to make a comparative analysis to
discover and or discern the applicable differences related to emphasized similarities.
Similarities bond in chemical compounding; it’s the chemistry of their beings. Thus, you start from strength. It is
the natural order of things. In the relationship of water, does the
hydrogen argue with the oxygen and say, “I’m putting in more than you?”
No, because they both know that as one, they’re better than as separated ones. This is kids level understanding, so what do you think when a legal
scholar can’t or doesn’t expound on the theoretical philosophy upon which she builds her practical case
The question then becomes, can we defy natural order (Patternology – you already know that’s a progeny of this
pedagogy) and still expect to win. Yes, we can expect anything we
want. Reality doesn’t speak in English, American or Hindu, it speaks
in the revelation of truth; the good and the bad.
Believe you me, it’s going to be a good. The Case! The book about the Supreme Court Associate Justice, living in the age of a
pandemic, undresses her mind to how we should view her as a jurist with Originalist/Texturalist as fait
Man, she to me her juris prudence represents a wealth of entertainment, from music to literature to
video/movie. The first Justice who is portrayed of and for the beauty
of her mind; a brilliant one at that, but couldn’t decide on seeing the trees or the forest.
That’s unreal. Indecisive, but sure about what she’s been sold; I
mean, told. (Gavel knock, knock, knock) Order in the
court! Judge, as a concerned educator, may I approach the
Thank you Your Honor, if a good story doesn’t excite you……………
Can you define your Infiniteness of One Theorem in simple terms,
because it seems illogical?
Let’s start with a few irrefutable facts as I deem
1. All matter, material and immaterial
life can be represented as patterns of frequency vibrations.
2. The faster the vibrations, the less the
3. One is the only true value mathematical
number, because all others are a resultant of one.
4. The most important numeric pattern is
the one from zero to one.
5. One in Nature is a three component
composition of energy, frequency, mass
6. Everything is energy and energy is one, the only true theorem (meaning, one is a
representation of reality codified as a numerical value) and even it isn’t a factual representation; as,
nothing is one in reality and nature.
In Nature, I have defined one as a three component
compositional entity of energy, frequency and mass represented as the symbol of one. This is the truest fact of
everything; nothing in life is one, because one is an abstract theoretical mathematical concept
of Applied Logical
Construct to represent reality.
One is one because it is a composition of parts and to
deduce a thing to get to one as a singularity, you’d have to get to infinity, because one is everything and
everything is one – The Infiniteness of One Theorem.
In the physics of Quantum Mechanics, this would be classified as the “spectral gap,” the point of getting from zero (ground
state) to one (the first/lowest energy state). For the sake of
simplicity, I will say zero is the state of material dormancy, like bears
hibernating. It is dead, but alive. Yes, illogical.
To deliver illogic, even some matter is classified as
gapless. The scientific conclusion is, it’s impossible to determine if
all materials are gap or gapless. The application of logic to Nature
isn’t science, because Nature isn’t logical, it is; logic is a man-made construct. Bees fly – illogical, ships float – illogical. Light
cuts steel – illogical.
Humans apply logic as it’s the best and
highest intellectual ability to make “sense” and “sanity “of
life. Perhaps, were we smarter, we’d be on another/higher dimensional
plane or another planet?
For simplification, I deduced everything down to being
defined by a single word – patterns. Patterns are
representation of energy and everything can be defined by motion, even that which appears
motionless. Yes, even the motionless has
motion. That’s illogical you say? Well, you’re beginning to see the light.
Speaking of light, it represents the fastest patterns
and in one instance it’s patterned as a beam and in another, it’s patterned as a
wave. Well, I agree that’s illogical. The faster the vibration, the less it vibrates. Illogical, but as an
example, an idling Harley Davidson vibrates more than when it’s at highway cruising speeds.
Vibration frequency is the foundation of all material
and immaterial life of motion. Matter or material in its ground state
(zero) energy level and when the energy of heat is applied to said matter/material, the heat causes the atoms to
emit light or glow. Think red hot.
The heated material provides “gap patterns” in the
form of light emitted in various frequencies/speeds (think in terms of crawl, walk, jog, run) due to and because
of the different energy levels of the heated atoms in the material composition.
This act of getting from a material’s ground state
(zero) to its first energy state (one), provides the critical analysis for the mathematics of quantum mechanics,
called the spectral
Given that “one” is a material’s first or lowest
energy state, think of one being a crawl, two a walk, three a jog and four a run. Each gap represents a different frequency/speed and provides the basis for gap
patterns. This is merely used to provide an understanding that the
spectral gap is/can be one plus frequency multiples/exponents of one.
I need to return to
Germany: Meines Deutsch sind sehr schlecht und Buchstabieren auch,
aber Kennen Sie David
Hilbert? He greatly
influenced mathematics and is credited with the spectral theory or functional analysis.
transitioning of going from zero to one can happen even when a
material composition is kept at an extremely low temperature. The zero
phase of a material just means, material dormancy (my definition). I postulate that both states (zero and one)
must exist for the material to exist; and to apply the energy of heat only causes the duality of its master
pattern (zero state) to exist simultaneously with the active pattern (one state).
Think in terms of
electricity. There is a stator (unmoving master pattern) and a
rotator (moving active pattern). This duality is necessary for
electricity, as well as an atom. When calm waters change into
rushing ebbs and flows, waves are created when/where the two energy forces of ebbs and flows meet.
Three component Composition of Energy (time),
Frequency (motion) and Mass (material/matter) and in its zero state, the master pattern of the material/matter
at which point it maintains its mass (ice). Apply the energy of heat
and that causes the frequency and mass of ice to change to water and further heating changes
water to the lesser mass of steam.
The theoretical physics spectral gap concept of getting from zero to one means, it is fundamental to the
understanding of quantum phases. I say, two phases (inert or not) or
patterns; one moving and one unmoving, with the unmoving/stator pattern the master pattern and the
moving/rotator pattern(s) the stasis or phase change pattern(s).
Energy, frequency and mass are one, the same and
everything: without energy you can’t have frequency or mass, and
without frequency you can’t have energy or mass, and without mass you reach a point of infiniteness or the
unification of everything as 1. Everything's a patterned compositional construct to comprise
To describe this phenomenon, I created a three part
composition equation to simply describe my Infiniteness of One Theorem:
1 = (1+1) -:- 2. One person equals (one part female + one part male) divided by two
parents. Examples of factors, multiples, and
divisors: positive-negative, stator-rotator, gap-gapless, space-time,
egg white-yolk, ebb-flow.
Hilbert conceived of what is known as the
“Entscheidungs Problem” or decision problem. Entschuldigung, aber Das
Problem is auch uber meines Deutsch, so schlecht (Kann ich erzähl eine gute Witz, bischen Spass
Turing, the Englishman most famous for breaking
the German Enigma
code during WWII; but it was his 1937 paper “On Computable
Numbers and the Application to the
Entscheidungsproblem, but also known for the influence
of Gödel’s now known as Incomplete Theorems, on his work.
The point is; Hilbert and his spectral theory and
Endentscheidungsproblem, Godel and his Incompleteness Theorems, and Turing, as founder of the field of modern
computer science and his Computer Science of Undecideability; the human
measure of mind leads us to indefinable incompleteness.
The invisible transmission of data through the air in
the form of digital communication, do you consider that logical? Think
ESP, quantum teleportation, interstellar travel and thought teleportation, are they logical?
The application of logic to an illogical apparatus
means we’re operating at a disadvantage. Language (alphabet) and
mathematics (numbers) aren’t logical, they’re pattern-based symbolic systems used to represent our sense,
codification, understanding and comprehension of Nature and life. Time
is logical to humanity, not Nature; where time is energy.
To determine the veracity and or validation of
something in the natural science/physics realm through our application of logic, means you don’t understand
Nature isn’t logical or illogical, it simply is, and as such, will leave you and science in a place
of Schrödinger's cat, like the hibernating bear that’s dead, but alive.
Religion speaks of God and logic says HE is impossible. So my
approach to religion, science and life I titled: The Possibility of the
Impossible. It was impossible to define everything by a single
word, until I did and created an entire pedagogy based upon that single word of Patterns. Something never been accomplished!
Mike Kara Media
A formal transcript of some of the basic areas covered for the simplified version
presented to radio listeners and the music presented. Please direct questions, concerns, comments to: 407 334 6218,
The Drumatization of Education
music and dance to teach STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics). This pedagogy is about
practicum-based learning, the primary focus is on fun, so consider the idea of “Druma Drama,” as it nicely fits into The
Drumatization of Education.
Drama, is my dramatic themed series of Vibration Frequency Drumming. Music and dance serve as the basis of culture and
this is no difference.
build from simplicity, we start with the drum. Why? The drum, I determined, is the best instrument invented, of
all instruments, scientific or otherwise, that best represents the basis of this entire pedagogy.
to this mission, it's not only the best, but also one of the least expensive tools on which I could
research and provide more validation of it as a theorem through empirical evidence.
research eventually grows into a mental development that is transformed into a physical form - a
musical progeny in the form of recordings.
starters, the drum and speaker are of similar constructs, as they both are resonators with a vibrating membrane
to create sound through the reflection of vibration frequency sound waves.
There is a
big difference between a theory and a theorem and that distinction will be self-evident based upon the fact,
this is a practicum-based theorem, a practicum-based pedagogy. Do-Learning!
Frequency Drumming Research: 1 drum + 1 note / 2 hands = The Infiniteness of One Theorem. The simplicity of one
transforming itself into the complexity of infiniteness; one drum, one note.
myself a “druma” because I’m not worthy to call myself a, drummer. This is all about:
Drama and how
one and everything comes from one and I’m going to use a single drum that plays a single note. Its inherent
nature is vibration frequency and through the force of energy, energy is created as sound.
hitting the drum’s head causes vibration frequency within the skin/material, and while it’s vibrating, I add
more vibration, through hitting the head in frequency patterns.
theorem is correct, I should be able to create/imitate sounds (vibration frequency) wave within human sound
one goes into any and all numbers (frequencies), and therefore, in theory, with the correct compounding of
vibration frequencies, I should be able to imitate/create any sound within the vibration frequency range of
sound audible to human hearing.
through proper vibration frequency compounding, I should in theory, make this single note instrument imitate any
sound using this single note; limited only by equipment and human capability.
show you what “um” working with. The drum, the one note simpleton; one drum communicates in one syllable; as
other instruments are multisyllabic.
is every note and one note is all notes; and therefore, I will be able to create any and all notes from one,
because the distinguishing difference is not the vibration, but the frequency.
the application of the, “Addition Through Divisional Subtraction” upon which the Infiniteness of One Theorem is
based, I should be able to provide proof of concept.
reveals the drum is dumb. I take it to my patterns-based pedagogy school and teach it to be more than a one
note, one syllable, one trick pony.
imitation is the sincerest form
of flattery, then I taught the dumb drum that, imagination is the sincerest form of flattery. Be you, but be new, and that’s when this one note
specialist came alive.
I told the
dummy, I going to try and teach you to imitate human speech; you monkey; as this is your highest calling. First,
I taught it to stutter and secondly, I taught it to stutter in patterns and finally, I taught it to stutter in
imitations of human speech. This is Level Three, the dumb drum’s highest calling.
it to imitate other musical instruments, and on the lowest level, I taught it to be a single drum one note
soloist and an accompanist instrument lead.
single note stutterer, I implemented patterns to turn it into a multi-syllabic vibration frequency communicator.
It is the compounding of vibrations using specific pattern techniques to create “Frequency Variables” to be
voiced from this one note dummy.
short, I’ve discovered and taught myself and the drum to mimic human speech on a few occasions; of which, a few
of them I was fortunate enough to get them recorded before they disappeared back into the
I play the drum like a piano, guitar, drum set, saxophone, etc This is called, “Chordal Drumming” the
techniques-based system of drumming through the application of hand-strokes, shapes, positions, patterns and
beatings to create drum head vibrations revealed as sounds.
not a word, but it is in this pedagogy. Chordal Drumming is a technical style of drumming founded upon the physics of
vibration frequencies, the mathematics of exponentials, the neuro-sensory (feedback) application of
hearing-feelings and the biomechanics (responsive) application of anatomical kinetic energy; called, Neurophonic
pedagogy has a two-track learning system, where first track is educational and the second track is
commercial/cultural related. Neurophonic Audio is the educational track and The JaHazz Sound is the
track one or the educational track is, Vibrational Frequency Dancing and track two or commercial/cultural track
is, JaHazzing Dancing.
Audio is best
described as: Sound frequencies patterned for non-invasive neurotransmission brainwave stimulation. (SAMPLE
through head phones is the most effective method and means.)
will discover using headphones? It’s like teaching the brain to hold two opposing thoughts at once and in this
pedagogy, this ability is named: Ambineurodexterity.
practicum application of ambidextrous sensory sensation stimulus inputs for neurological translation and
transformation into corresponding psychological or physiological output). The purpose is to generate greater
cognitive ability for learning comprehension.
Sound is best
described as: An orchestra of sound patterns harmonized to elicit physical movements related to the beat
Frequency Dancing – The
application of the kinetic energy to speak in the communicative language of motion to teach
Dancing – The
commercial/cultural translation for the purpose of cultural relevancy.
SONGS PRESENTED FOR INTERVIEW:
I Got Got: An example of a Neurophonic Sound
commercial track (listen with headphones)
World Identity Theft: A song in which you will
hear the drum speak a few words
Mental: Hear Chordal Druming as the drum is played like
a rhythm guitar
Highpy (High on
Happy): A JaHazz Sound example
Book: This is a JaHazz Sound love song
Dirteen: A young relative learning to
talk said thirteen and I heard dirteen and this song title was born as a JaHazz Sound
it is not readily apparent or conceptualize; but it happened through research osmosis.
The Neurological Sound Research
Thesis (NSRT) started it and serves as the foundation of the
music named: Neurophonic
Audio (education track) and The JaHazz Sound (commercial track). Of which the scientific research premise of their creation is
presented below (see The Science).
The resultant dance is
designated for curricular studies as: A performance art and science-based language, communicated through
motion movement expressions, in a dialect called: JaHazzing Dancing.
Today, as a researcher for
NuNique Institute Knowledge Engineering; an intellectual property-based nonprofit school for inventive types,
is the officially copyright owners and as such, all rights and privileges apply.
The research is being presented
to the public by its creator, Thomas Fuller. The goal of which is to have his
music and dance styles be taught to the public, and a local dance studio and the internet are the first
initial testing grounds.
What is The JaHazz Sound?
A genre/style of music that’s the result of scientific research
by Thomas Fuller for NuNique Institute Knowledge Engineering, an intellectual property-based
For the sake of simplicity and understanding, imagine the waxing
and waning of ocean waves as signals and you’re standing perpendicular; as these two different input frequencies
(waves) integrate in and out of phase. The result is the constant increasing and decreasing differences (think
surfing) creating an amplitude-modulated standing wave.
This fluctuating rhythm at the frequency of the difference
between the two auditory inputs creates a neurological third beat. Visualize, the ocean wave rushing out from
shore (waxing) is met by a wave rushing in to shore (waning) and at the meeting point the two waves grow to
create that third action. This is the wave surfers surf, that third beat.
Scientifically, when two different frequencies signals are
presented; one to each ear, they cause the brain to detect differences in the phase between the signals. A
detected phased difference under normal and natural circumstances would provide directional
Neurologically, The Neurophonic Audio causes the brain to
process the signals differently, and to effectively experience this third beat. It is this imaginary “third
beat” upon which JaHazzing Dancing is based.
In listening to Neurophonic Audio or The JaHazz Sound, the
perceptual integration of the two signals taking place causes the brain to actually produce the psycho-sensory
awareness of a third “beat” frequency. Thus, it is based upon 5 dimensions of sound or 5D
Due to and because of the fact, the entire pedagogy is
theorem-based and has its own sine wave, JaHazzing Dancing; likewise, is based upon the 5 dimensions (5D) of
sound and so named:
JaHazzebu, or ZeBu.
JaHazzomo, or ZoMo.
5 Dimension Sound Diagram/Sine wave
Time: first dimension of Motion
Wave: second dimension of State
Phase, core dimension of Vibration
Axis, fourth dimension of Frequency
Degree, fifth dimension of Point
Known as; Knowledge Engineering Pedagogy, it teaches
5 Dimensions (5D) of music and dance:
Education Music Track 1 (The Neurophonic
Commercial Music Track 2 (The JaHazz
Education Dance Track 1 (Vibration Frequency
Dancing) and Commercial Dance Track 2 (JaHazzing
Stay tuned: The Future of Now; Coming
to ears near you.
NuNique Institute Knowledge
of GOD in a human form
of personality and character, expressed in the uniqueness of self and exhibited as an infinite creative force
of goodness, IS projected through
the works of intelligent acts and expressions related to education and knowledge, but most of
Below: Numeric Logarithmic
(Note: these are actual numbers at microscopic level of a
patterns-based curriculum test)
T-SHIRT; Free with $25
donation. Those that know; know and those who don't, better
recognize our unIQue
The Infiniteness of One
The Entrepreneurship of
Jack of all trades; Master of
Unique To Dream